Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

Discussion Jumpstarter

Study leader reference - not a definitive answer
Question 9
The speaker claims early Christians identified “four types of murder” Rome often excused—war, abortion, infanticide, and gladiator games—and quotes Cyprian calling war “murder…committed wholesale”; how do these early Christian assumptions challenge modern evangelical comfort with nationalism, military virtue, or “just war” thinking?
Another way to ask: If early Christians treated war, abortion, infanticide, and gladiator games as forms of murder, how should that challenge modern Christians who feel comfortable with nationalism, military pride, or “just war” ideas?
Discussion Jumpstarter

Direct Answer
The transcript presents early Christian thought as treating war itself as a form of murder and refusing to celebrate mass killing as “virtue,” which challenges any Christian comfort with glorifying military violence or baptizing national conflict as righteous. While the speaker doesn’t directly address “just war theory,” his claim that Christianity was “the first…to recognize war as murder” pushes against easy evangelical nationalism.

Support from Transcript:
  • He says Christians pointed out four “types of murder” Rome didn’t treat as murder: “war…abortion…infanticide…gladiator contest.”
  • Cyprian is quoted: “Murder…is called a virtue when it is committed wholesale,” explicitly condemning war’s moral framing.
  • The speaker adds, “As far as I know, Christianity was the first religion to recognize war as murder,” and that early Christians were “very vocal about this.”
  • He clarifies their method: not political takeover—“not out in the streets with signs”—but calling people into God’s kingdom.
  • He emphasizes mercy for the helpless (infants, unborn) and criticizes hidden violence: “lack of mercy to somebody who is absolutely helpless.”
Discussion Follow-ups If war can be “murder wholesale,” what does that do to how Christians speak about soldiers, heroes, and national myths? How can a church honor individuals while still questioning the moral story the state tells?