Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

Discussion Jumpstarter

Study leader reference - not a definitive answer
Question 6
Chrysostom lists multiple hierarchies (husband/wife, parent/child, master/servant, teacher/disciple, ruler/ruled) and calls anarchy “evil”; which of those forms of subjection most triggers modern resistance in you, and what does your resistance suggest about whether you’re “getting used to” the kind of ordered authority the speaker says will exist even in eternity?
Another way to ask: Chrysostom lists different kinds of authority (like parent/child, teacher/student, ruler/ruled) and says anarchy is evil. Which kind of being under authority bothers you most, and what might that say about your comfort with ordered authority as part of God’s plan?
Discussion Jumpstarter

Direct Answer
The transcript pushes us to examine where we “bristle” at submission, because resisting ordered authority may reveal we are being shaped more by modern anti-subjection instincts than by God’s design. The speaker argues that learning to live under authority now is preparation for eternity, where God’s government and ordered roles will still exist.

Support from Transcript:
  • Chrysostom is quoted listing “many governments and forms of subjection… man and wife… father and son… teacher and disciple… ruler and ruled.”
  • He adds: “For anarchy, no matter where it is, is evil and a cause of turmoil.”
  • The speaker observes modern reaction: “today, people bristle… we don’t like to hear about subjection.”
  • He contrasts past perspective: historically, hierarchy “made life work,” and Christians were “very willing to be under authority.”
  • He connects it to eternity: “There is always going to be government… God’s government,” and warns, “If you don’t like being under authority now, you’re going to be miserable spending eternity with God.”
Discussion Follow-ups Which authority relationships do you instinctively distrust, and why? How can submission be practiced without excusing abuse (a topic the transcript doesn’t directly address but the question raises)?