Skip to content

Discussion Jumpstarter

Study leader reference - not a definitive answer
Question 10
The speaker quotes Nugent: if God’s strategy is a people whose life together reflects the kingdom, “any other strategy is apostasy,” and he pushes “prioritizing our community” with specific practices like regular shared meals, help in emergencies (his son’s injury), and “Sundays are out”; what concrete changes to your home life and calendar would make your community visibly non-optional, and which relationships in your church would become harder—but more honest—if you truly treated one-anothering as God’s primary strategy for blessing the world?
Another way to ask: What real changes to your schedule and home life would show that your church community is not optional? If you took “one another” seriously, which relationships at church might get harder but also become more honest?
Discussion Jumpstarter

Direct Answer
The speaker’s concrete vision is a church where shared life is scheduled, normal, and sacrificial: regular meals around tables, practical help in crises, and intentional connection beyond Sunday meetings. Treating one-anothering as God’s primary strategy would make certain strained or avoided relationships unavoidable, pushing the church toward more honest love, confession, and mutual service.

Support from Transcript:
  • Nugent is quoted strongly: if God’s strategy is a life-together people, “any other strategy is apostasy…any doctrine that competes with it, heresy.”
  • He defines the priority: “we are called first and foremost to put our all into our local community…loving each other…sharing with each other.”
  • Concrete home practice: “have someone from our congregation…around our table…every other week or once a month or every week.”
  • He challenges typical rhythms: “Sundays are out…What if we try to do it more throughout the week randomly?”
  • Emergency example: his son’s injury, and “the incredible privilege of a community to help us…they all hopped in and helped.”
  • He links this to witness: he hoped neighbors “caught that glimpse of the kingdom of people living together and helping each other out.”
Discussion Follow-ups Who would you need to invite in, not just the people you naturally enjoy? If community becomes “non-optional,” what conflicts, old wounds, or awkward gaps in relationship might finally need to be addressed through real one-anothering?