Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

Discussion Jumpstarter

Study leader reference - not a definitive answer
Question 2
The teaching argues that the scriptural elder qualifications are overwhelmingly character-based, with “apt to teach” as the only gift listed (1 Timothy 3; Titus 1); how should that reorder what your church celebrates, platforming decisions, and what you personally look for when you “feel helped” by a leader?
Another way to ask: Elder requirements in the Bible focus mostly on character, with “able to teach” as the main skill (1 Timothy 3; Titus 1). How should that change who your church celebrates and puts up front, and what you look for when a leader “helps” you?
Discussion Jumpstarter

Direct Answer
The transcript suggests churches should celebrate proven virtue and integrity more than impressive talent, and platforming should follow character that has been tested over time. Personally, “feeling helped” should include being led toward Christlike maturity, not just being impressed by ability.

Support from Transcript:
  • “Character comes before competence…character is born out of virtue.”
  • “Elders are chosen for character, not talent, gifts, or personality.”
  • From 1 Timothy 3 and Titus 1 he lists integrity, self-control, gentleness, hospitality, faithfulness; “apt to teach…that’s the only spiritual gift…all the other ones are character-based.”
  • “The call to eldership centers on being, not just doing.”
  • “A gifted man without virtue misleads. A virtuous man with modest gifts shepherds well.”
Discussion Follow-ups When you evaluate a leader, do you weigh humility, repentance, and consistency as heavily as clarity and charisma? What would it look like to publicly honor “progress” in virtue the way the speaker honored it in his example of Jason?