Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

Discussion Jumpstarter

Study leader reference - not a definitive answer
Question 5
The speaker warns that many people quote early Christians only when they agree (“they’re great”) and dismiss them when they disagree (“they fell into heresy”); what are some doctrines where you can feel that reflex in yourself, and what does that reflex say about whether you’re seeking truth or defending a tribe?
Another way to ask: Where do you tend to quote early Christians when they agree with you but reject them when they don’t? What does that show about whether you want truth or just want your group to win?
Discussion Jumpstarter

Direct Answer
The transcript suggests this reflex shows up most sharply around baptism and communion, where many are quick to label early Christian teaching as “heresy” while praising the Fathers elsewhere when they support Anabaptist distinctives. The reflex reveals a temptation to defend “what our church believes” rather than patiently seeking truth with charity.

Support from Transcript:
  • He describes the pattern: “If it fits what we believe… ‘those early Christians are great’… But as soon as they say something different… ‘Well, they fell into heresy there.’”
  • He shares personal experience: an Anabaptist pastor preached about people who “go too far,” and later he learned it was aimed at him for suggesting “maybe we should give some weight” when the Fathers differ.
  • He summarizes the expected stopping point: “You stop as soon as they say something different than what we believe.”
  • He says baptism is where condemnation often lands: “That’s usually where people condemn the early Christians.”
  • He calls the labeling “uncharitable” and tied to harsh judging: “so quick to call people heretics… apostasy.”
Discussion Follow-ups How can you tell when you’re testing a belief by Scripture versus protecting your group’s identity and boundaries?