Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Discussion Jumpstarter

Study leader reference - not a definitive answer
Hope For Wondering Amish / The Story of David Bercot
Watch Full Video
Question 10
David described 15 years of hesitating to join Anabaptists because of “legitimate biblical standards” versus “a lot of cultural standards,” plus his longing for “500 years of stability” and concern over radical Christians who “don’t want to come under church authority”; how do you discern when stability is godly fruit versus mere tradition, and what uncomfortable submission (to community, discipline, limitations on independence) might modern Christians need to recover to resemble the “historic faith” he pursued?
Another way to ask: David hesitated to join Anabaptists because he saw both real Bible standards and extra cultural rules, and he also wanted long-term stability and church authority. How can you tell when “stability” is a good spiritual fruit and not just tradition, and what kind of hard submission to church and community might Christians need to relearn?
Discussion Jumpstarter

Direct Answer
David’s story suggests stability is godly fruit when it supports obedience to Scripture, faithful families, and accountable church life—not merely cultural uniformity for its own sake. To resemble the “historic faith,” modern Christians may need to recover submission to church authority and accept limits on independence.

Support from Transcript:
  • He distinguishes “legitimate biblical standards” from “a lot of cultural standards… very hard,” making the bridge “not an easy” one.
  • The timeline shows careful discernment: “from the time we first heard from them to the time we joined them was 15 years.”
  • He valued continuity: Anabaptists were “the closest thing… teaching very similarly to the early Christians… upholding the historic faith.”
  • He also valued proven durability: “they have 500 years of stability.”
  • He contrasts this with house church instability: “people… coming and going… financial issues… marriage issues… unwillingness to submit to church authority.”
  • He connects stability to visible fruit: “stable families… happy marriages… children who were happy,” contrasted with evangelical friends “now divorced and remarried.”
Discussion Follow-ups How can a church tell whether a “standard” is biblical obedience or cultural boundary-marking—and what forms of accountability (membership, discipline, shared expectations) would most modern believers resist but perhaps most need?
Jumpstarter 10 of 10
Previous All Questions Next