Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

Discussion Questions

PDF
Tip: Discuss these with your study group.
The speaker says she used to try to “write off” 1 Corinthians as “the hair’s the covering” or “just a cultural thing,” but “knew in my heart of hearts that wasn’t right”; what does that reveal about how she believes God communicates authority through Scripture, and how does that challenge the way many modern Christians decide which passages still apply? JumpstartAnother way to ask: What does it show about how she thinks God speaks through the Bible when she felt she couldn’t explain away 1 Corinthians as “just cultural”? How does that challenge how many Christians today choose which verses still matter?
When she describes the Bible as “very plain and simple” and says “you don’t need to read between lines,” what assumptions about God’s intent and clarity are being made—and where do you feel resistance to that approach in your own reading of difficult commands? JumpstartAnother way to ask: When she says the Bible is “plain and simple” and you don’t need to read between the lines, what does she assume about how clear God wants His commands to be? Where do you push back on that when you read hard passages?
The speaker wore a scarf in the balcony, put it on only for the sermon, and later called herself “cowardly”; what does her embarrassment expose about the fear of man in church settings, and how might early Christians have expected believers to handle public visibility when obeying contested practices? JumpstartAnother way to ask: What does her embarrassment about wearing a scarf in church show about wanting people’s approval? How might the early church have expected believers to obey if it made them stand out in public?
After church members praised her head covering as “really pretty” and “you look so good,” she realized they thought it was a fashion statement; what does that moment suggest about how outward symbols can be neutralized by a culture of self-expression, and how can Christians keep obedience from being reinterpreted as personal style? JumpstartAnother way to ask: What does it show about our culture that people thought her head covering was just a fashion choice? How can Christians obey outward commands without turning them into “personal style”?
She noticed that when she wore the covering repeatedly, comments stopped because people “realized what I was doing, and they didn’t want to go down that road themselves”; what does this imply about how conviction spreads (or is resisted) within a congregation, and what responsibilities do believers have toward one another when one person’s obedience makes others uncomfortable? JumpstartAnother way to ask: What does it say about church life that people got quiet when they realized she was wearing it out of conviction? What should believers do when one person’s obedience makes others uncomfortable?
Sam told her, “Just take it off,” but she replied, “I have to. Scripture says I have to, and I feel convicted to, so I must”; how does that exchange challenge common evangelical language about “freedom,” personal conscience, and not being “legalistic,” and where is the line between patient discipleship and delayed obedience? JumpstartAnother way to ask: How does her “I have to—Scripture says I have to” response challenge how Christians talk about freedom, conscience, and avoiding being “legalistic”? When does being patient in discipleship become an excuse to delay obedience?
She says wearing the covering brought “peace,” even “protected almost,” and that what looks like “suppression” in the world felt like “freedom” to her; what does this teach about God’s character and the kind of freedom He offers, and what Christian practices today might be dismissed as oppressive but actually form people into peace? JumpstartAnother way to ask: What does it teach about God that something the world calls “suppression” felt like peace and freedom to her? What Christian practices today seem oppressive to outsiders but can actually lead to peace?
Giving up the engagement ring was “really hard” because of its story, yet she concluded, “what’s more important?… God is,” then they sold it because “what’s the point of having that?”; what does this reveal about how she weighs sentimental value, marital symbols, and discipleship—and what treasured items in your life would be hardest to surrender if you believed God asked it? JumpstartAnother way to ask: What does giving up the engagement ring show about choosing God over sentimental or marriage symbols? What item would be hardest for you to give up if you believed God asked you to?
She connects modesty not only to coverage but to “being very simple” and “being careful with what you’re spending your money on,” and she found secondhand stores and layering helpful; how does that definition of modesty confront modern Christian spending habits, and what concrete changes would it require in how you shop, budget, and present yourself? JumpstartAnother way to ask: How does her idea of modesty (simple living and careful spending) challenge how many Christians use money? What would you need to change in how you shop, budget, and present yourself?
The speaker says dwelling on thoughts like “I look frumpy or silly” makes them stronger and attributes this to “the evil one… putting thoughts in your mind,” but she learned to dismiss them; how does that view of spiritual warfare apply to everyday obedience, and what practical habits could a group adopt to help each other resist identity-and-image anxieties while pursuing holiness? JumpstartAnother way to ask: If negative thoughts about looking silly can be part of spiritual warfare, how does that affect everyday obedience? What simple habits could your group practice to fight image anxiety and keep growing in holiness?

Discussion Jumpstarter

Discussion stalled? Read the Jumpstarter for help getting conversation flowing again.

Discussion Jumpstarter

Discussion stalled? Read the Jumpstarter for help getting conversation flowing again.