Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

Discussion Jumpstarter

Study leader reference - not a definitive answer
Question 2
The speaker says “no tiny amount of allegiance that’s due to Jesus should get siphoned off to anybody else”; what practical “siphoning” does that look like in real life (language, hopes, fears, online behavior, voting talk), and how can a group tell when it has crossed that line?
Another way to ask: What are some real ways our loyalty to Jesus gets “leaked” to other people or causes (in our words, fears, posts, or voting talk)? How can a group tell when that’s happening?
Discussion Jumpstarter

Direct Answer
The transcript suggests “siphoning” happens when Christians give the intensity, trust, and identity-signaling that belongs to Jesus to a party, leader, or policy—especially when it makes them excuse disobedience to Jesus.

Support from Transcript:
  • He says, “no tiny amount of allegiance that’s due to Jesus should get siphoned off to anybody else.”
  • He warns about “blind allegiance… to a party” that makes us “blind to our single-hearted allegiance to Jesus.”
  • He describes allegiance as producing a concrete lifestyle (enemy-love, humility, truthfulness, no oaths, no divorce, modesty), not vague admiration.
  • He criticizes Christians who “ignore… failures… almost selling out that part so we can gain a little piece of… political power.”
  • He gives a clear online example: “If we’re on the internet vigorously arguing that we bomb Iran, that’s where our heart is.”
  • He notes some argue for “the least bad way to disobey Jesus,” showing their passion is captured by politics rather than Jesus.
Discussion Follow-ups A group may have crossed the line when it regularly justifies what it would confront inside the church. What topics make you immediately defensive—Jesus’ commands, or your preferred political outcomes?