Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Question 7
Paul’s list begins (in this teaching) with same-sex practice, and Chrysostom is quoted: “There surely is not a more grievous evil than this audacious practice,” while the speaker still insists Christians shouldn’t use political force—how can a church hold uncompromising moral clarity without sliding into either cowardly silence or worldly power-struggles?
Another way to ask: How can a church speak clearly about sin (including same-sex practice) without either staying silent out of fear or trying to win through political power?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests the church should openly name what God calls sin (“call a spade a spade”) and teach it inside the community, while refusing to “control the world” through activism or coercion; instead, the church’s strategy is spiritual transfer—bringing people into God’s kingdom. Moral clarity stays uncompromising when it is rooted in Scripture and discipleship, not in a fight for social dominance.

Support from Transcript:

  • The speaker says Paul places same-sex practice at the top of the Gentile sins list and adds, “God thinks otherwise” than modern cultural messaging.
  • He quotes Chrysostom: “There surely is not a more grievous evil than this audacious practice,” underscoring seriousness.
  • Yet he draws a clear method boundary: “not our position…to try to control the world,” and early Christians didn’t march with “placards.”
  • Still, Christians must speak: Paul “didn’t hesitate to call a spade a spade either.”
  • The positive alternative is evangelistic: “Christians didn’t try to change the world, but they did bring people out of that kingdom into the kingdom of God.”
  • He warns against compromise when society demands approval: “we cannot compromise with the world.”
Discussion Follow-ups What would it look like for a church to be clear in teaching yet gentle toward sinners seeking repentance? Where does your congregation feel pressure—toward silence, or toward combative activism?