Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 3
The transcript includes the repeated conversation-stopper: “Yeah, okay… but we’re not saved by works”; what New Testament teachings did the speaker list that get dismissed this way (non-resistance, swearing, divorce/remarriage, court, head covering), and what does that pattern reveal about what we really believe grace is “for”?
Another way to ask: The transcript keeps shutting things down with, “Yeah, okay… but we’re not saved by works.” Which New Testament teachings did the speaker say get brushed off that way, and what does that show about what we think grace is really for?

Direct Answer He lists several concrete New Testament commands that people acknowledge as biblical but then set aside with “we’re not saved by works.” The pattern suggests many treat grace as a reason obedience is optional rather than as the basis for forgiveness plus a call to serious discipleship.

Support from Transcript:

  • He describes a repeated scenario “12, 15, 20 times”: show someone a teaching of Christ or the NT, they agree, then conclude, “But we’re not saved by works,” and “that ends it.”
  • He gives examples of what gets dismissed: “non-resistance,” “swearing,” “divorce and remarriage,” “taking your brother to court,” and “the head covering.”
  • He laments the practical result: “So why is it in the Bible?” if the final takeaway is “let’s not worry about it.”
  • He ties this to the reinterpretation he critiques: not adding Moses (Judaizers) but “taking away from Jesus’s commandments.”
  • He later connects grace to reverential obedience: don’t “talk about the blood of Christ” while “totally ignore what he taught.”
Discussion Follow-ups What would change in our churches if we treated grace primarily as power and mercy to obey, rather than permission to neglect hard teachings?

Jumpstarter 3 of 10
Back Questions Next