Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 9
Dean’s guiding verse, Mark 9:50—“Have salt in yourselves, and have peace with one another”—is applied to disputes about who is “with us”; what would it mean in your current theological or church conflicts to be genuinely “salty” (convicted, non-compromising) while also pursuing peace, and where do you personally tend to sacrifice one for the other?
Another way to ask: In your current church or theology conflicts, what would it look like to be firm in your convictions while still working for peace? Where do you tend to choose peace over truth, or truth over peace?

Direct Answer Dean applies Mark 9:50 to mean we should hold deep convictions (“salt”) without turning disagreements into sectarian warfare, because Jesus rebuked the apostles for trying to stop others who weren’t “with us.” Practically, that means being clear about what you believe while practicing humility and peace toward other believers.

Support from Transcript:

  • Dean calls Mark 9:50 his “guiding verse” over church history and theology: “Have salt in yourself and have peace with one another.”
  • Context he gives: apostles complain, “they’re not with us… you need to stop them,” and Jesus responds: “He was not against me. It’s for me.”
  • Dean paraphrases the apostles’ error sharply: they acted like “it’s better to be demon-possessed than not do it their way.”
  • He explains balance: not mere “have peace” (wishy pop religion), and not only “have salt” (no compromise); Jesus says both.
  • He connects peace to humility: “have epistemological humility… people come about this in a different way.”
  • He insists conviction remains: “don’t be wishy-washy… be literally salty.”
Discussion Follow-ups In your conflicts, do you tend toward harsh “salt” without peace, or peace without “salt”? What would change if you assumed other Christians might be “for” Jesus even if not “with us”?

Jumpstarter 9 of 10
Back Questions Next