Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 6
The speaker warns that dismissing the passage as “not salvation-related” can become idolatry—“we don’t want a God that actually is like this, so we’ll just make our own God and call it God”; what concrete signs show a person is reshaping God rather than submitting to Him, and how might that show up in our reactions to gendered commands?
Another way to ask: What are clear signs that someone is shaping God to fit what they want instead of obeying Him? How might that show up when people react to commands about men and women?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests a key sign of reshaping God is when we reinterpret clear passages to mean what we prefer, then discard related teachings that reinforce the same order. This often shows up in defensive reactions to gendered commands—treating them as embarrassing, culturally outdated, or irrelevant because they challenge our desires.

Support from Transcript:

  • He critiques the mindset: “Well, that doesn’t have anything to do with my salvation, so I don’t need to do it.”
  • He warns that making Scripture say something else creates “a God of your own… which is idolatry, which is a salvation issue.”
  • He describes a pattern: “you take these passages and make them however you want… and then you get rid of all the other verses that come along with that, the Ephesians 5 and the 1 Peter, and you just start sweeping all these things into the rug.”
  • He connects love and obedience: “If you’re loving God, you’ll obey God. And if you’re deliberately disobeying him, you’re not loving him.”
  • He ends with a warning about self-deception: “If you want to be fooled… you can find any explanation… you can even find contradictory ones.”
Discussion Follow-ups When a command feels threatening to our identity, do we search for truth or for escape? What would repentance look like if we realize we’ve been “sweeping” uncomfortable texts away?

Jumpstarter 6 of 10
Back Questions Next