Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 6
Epicurus chose atomism specifically to free people from fear of the gods and fear of the afterlife, and he reframed the gods as unconcerned “higher animals”; how does that motive (wanting relief from accountability) mirror Darwin’s later admission that he “hardly [could] see how anyone would wish Christianity to be true” because of eternal punishment?
Another way to ask: Epicurus used atomism to remove fear of the gods and the afterlife. How is that like Darwin saying he didn’t want Christianity to be true because of eternal punishment?

Direct Answer The transcript strongly shows Epicurus adopting atomism for emotional and moral relief—freedom from fear and accountability—rather than because it was proven true. However, the Darwin quotation in this question is not included in the provided transcript portion, so the exact parallel to Darwin’s “wish” cannot be directly confirmed here.

Support from Transcript:

  • Epicurus “started out wanting to free mankind from the fear of the gods and from the fear of the afterlife,” seeing that fear “dominated Greek life.”
  • He “chose the Atomist School of Thought because it fit his needs,” implying a motive-driven selection.
  • He taught the gods were merely “higher animals” and “are not concerned about us,” so people need not “offer sacrifices…or be afraid.”
  • He denied ongoing accountability: “When we die, we simply go into nonexistence…There’s no judgment. There’s no punishments.”
  • Bercot later generalizes that materialism leads to living without considering “punishments or rewards after death.”
Discussion Follow-ups Even without the Darwin quote here, what do you do when you notice yourself preferring a belief because it feels relieving? How can Christians guard against choosing ideas mainly because they remove fear or accountability?

Jumpstarter 6 of 10
Back Questions Next