Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 10 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 10
What concrete habits could a serious Christian develop in Bible study to seek the β€œmeeting of the minds” Bercot describes, rather than relying mainly on personal impressions, denominational assumptions, or modern theological categories?
Another way to ask: What habits can Christians build in Bible study to understand the writers’ meaning instead of relying mostly on personal feelings, church traditions, or modern theology?

Direct Answer

The transcript does not provide a full list of Bible-study habits, but it does suggest a central habit: seek the intended meaning of the original communicator and audience. A serious Christian should approach difficult passages by asking what the biblical writer meant and what the original readers likely understood.

Support from Transcript

- Bercot’s model for ambiguity is to ask the author: "I would write him and ask him what he meant." - His legal example does the same: contact the parties and ask "what they meant." - He calls this "simply common sense." - He applies it to Scripture by asking what the Corinthians would have done if Paul was unclear. - He says they could have "asked Paul to explain it." - He defines communication as "a meeting of the minds" between speaker and hearer.

Discussion Follow-ups

The excerpt does not mention personal impressions, denominations, or theological categories directly. But its practical direction is clear: do not begin with ourselves; seek the original act of communication.