Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 7 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 7
How does Bercot’s call to read Scripture with “objectivity and detachment” confront common evangelical assumptions that sincerity, strong faith, or confidence in grace are enough to protect us from serious doctrinal error?
Another way to ask: Bercot says we should read Scripture with fairness and a willingness to be corrected. How does this challenge the idea that being sincere, having strong faith, or trusting in grace will always protect us from wrong teaching?

Direct Answer

The transcript does not specifically mention evangelicalism, sincerity, strong faith, or confidence in grace. However, Bercot’s argument confronts any assumption that good intentions are enough, because he says people must actively overcome bias, preconceptions, and avoidance of contrary evidence.

Support from Transcript

- Bercot says people may claim to recognize that truth cannot be changed, but “our actions show otherwise.” - He says Christians “purposely ignore scriptures that oppose our doctrines.” - He says they “refuse to admit that other interpretations of key scriptures might be correct.” - He warns that even scholars “slant their translations of scripture to fit their own preconceptions.” - He says proper Scripture reading requires “the same objectivity and detachment with which a title lawyer reads a deed.” - He defines the right desire as having “no other desire than to know what scripture really means.”

Discussion Follow-ups

The transcript suggests that sincerity does not automatically remove bias. A person may be sincere and still read Scripture through preconceived beliefs unless he is willing to let truth correct him.