Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 10 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 10
The chapter concludes that “out of sheer necessity, we all add tradition and translational interpretation to the bare letter of Scripture.” What traditions or interpretive assumptions have most shaped your own reading of the Bible, and how willing are you to test them against the historic Christian record?
Another way to ask: Bercot concludes that we all bring tradition and translation choices to Scripture. What traditions or assumptions have shaped how you read the Bible, and are you willing to test them against early Christian history?

Direct Answer

The transcript cannot identify which traditions have shaped any individual reader’s Bible interpretation. However, Bercot’s argument calls each reader to recognize that they do have traditions and translational assumptions, and to be willing to test them against the historic Christian record.

Support from Transcript

- Bercot says, “Out of sheer necessity, we all add tradition and translational interpretation to the bare letter of Scripture.” - He argues that “there is simply no way to take just the Bible as our sole source of authority.” - He says translators must decide how to render Greek, including capitalization, commas, and quotation marks. - He asks whether we should rely on “the historic understandings of the early Christians” or “our own understandings.” - He says common sense points us toward “the historic record for our tradition and translations.” - He notes that some early Christians were close enough in time and language to understand the New Testament terms well.

Discussion Follow-ups

A useful discussion would invite readers to name their own inherited assumptions and ask whether those assumptions match the way early Christians understood Scripture.