Skip to content
The Historic Faith

Jumpstarter 9 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 9
The chapter ends by saying Protestants have “torn asunder the body of Christ so needlessly” because many who searched history “have not found what they wanted to find.” How can personal preference, denominational identity, or fear of change keep Christians from receiving historical evidence honestly?
Another way to ask: The chapter says Protestants have divided the body of Christ needlessly because many who studied history “have not found what they wanted to find.” How can personal preference, church identity, or fear of change keep Christians from accepting historical evidence honestly?

Direct Answer

The transcript suggests that Christians may reject or avoid historical evidence when it challenges what they already want to believe. It does not specifically analyze denominational identity or fear of change, but it does identify preconceptions and unwanted conclusions as major barriers.

Support from Transcript

- Bercot asks, “Why on earth have we Protestants torn asunder the body of Christ so needlessly?” - He says the reason is not that “no one else has ever thought of looking at the historic course of performance.” - Instead, “those who have searched the historical record have not found what they wanted to find.” - He says early Christian interpretations “bring us back to the meaning we would have seen to start with if we had not been blinded by our preconceptions.” - He urges readers to “begin with a blank slate.” - He also insists on going “to the primary sources” to determine early Christian practice.

Discussion Follow-ups

The transcript implies that honest interpretation requires willingness to be corrected by Scripture and history. It does not provide a detailed psychology of denominational loyalty, but it warns against letting desired outcomes control conclusions.