Skip to content
The Historic Faith

Jumpstarter 7 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 7
Hippolytus records that women in the Roman church were to use “an opaque cloth” and not a thin veil because “this is not a true covering.” What does this reveal about the early Christian concern for the substance of obedience rather than merely symbolic or minimal gestures?
Another way to ask: Hippolytus says women in the Roman church should wear “an opaque cloth,” not a thin veil, because “this is not a true covering.” What does this show about early Christians caring about real obedience, not just small or symbolic actions?

Direct Answer

Hippolytus’s statement shows that the early Christians were concerned that obedience actually fulfill the command, not merely appear to fulfill it. The transcript presents the Roman church as distinguishing between a real covering and something too thin to count as one.

Support from Transcript

- Hippolytus was “a leader in the church at Rome around the year 200.” - He compiled “a record of the various customs and practices in that church from the generations that preceded him.” - His Apostolic Tradition says, “let all the women have their heads covered with an opaque cloth.” - It specifically rejects “a veil of thin linen.” - The reason given is: “for this is not a true covering.” - This fits Tertullian’s criticism of minimal gestures, such as “a fringe, tuft, of cloth, or any thread whatever on the crown of their heads.”

Discussion Follow-ups

The transcript does not use the phrase “symbolic obedience,” but it clearly contrasts genuine covering with inadequate substitutes. The issue is not merely having something present, but whether it truly obeys the instruction.