Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 2 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 2
Origen replies to Celsus that Christians decline public office not to “escape public duties” but to reserve themselves “for a more divine and necessary service…for the salvation of men,” because Christians belong to “another national organization” founded by Christ. How would an early Christian’s sense of having a different “nation” reshape the way we talk about civic duty, patriotism, and leadership ambition today?
Another way to ask: If early Christians saw themselves as part of Christ’s “nation,” how would that change how we think about civic duty, patriotism, and wanting to be a leader today?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests early Christians saw themselves as citizens of a different nation—the Kingdom of God—so civic duty and leadership ambition were redirected toward church service and “the salvation of men,” not toward running the state. That outlook would weaken patriotic claims on our highest loyalty and make spiritual leadership and ministry the primary arena for Christian responsibility.

Support from Transcript:

  • Celsus urges: Christians “should take office in the government…for the maintenance of the laws.”
  • Origen replies Christians recognize “another national organization…founded by the word of God,” meaning Christ.
  • Origen says Christians decline office “not…escaping public duties” but to “reserve themselves for a more divine and necessary service…for the salvation of men.”
  • Bercot summarizes: “Christians already have a government, the Kingdom of God.”
  • He argues gifted leaders “should devote that gift to God’s service,” because there is “a great need for gifted leaders in the Kingdom of God.”
Discussion Follow-ups If our “nation” is the Kingdom, what does that do to slogans like “country first”? How might it change how we talk about “public service” to young Christians with leadership gifts?