Skip to content

Discussion Jumpstarter

Study leader reference - not a definitive answer
Question 4
He says, “Otherwise, we’re playing Anabaptist roulette,” and later claims “our margin of error is so slim we need to stop taking chances”; what modern habits or church practices does that statement indict, and what would it look like to actually live as if the margin of error is “so slim”?
Another way to ask: He says we’re taking risky chances and the “margin of error” is tiny. What everyday habits or church routines is he calling out, and what would change if you truly lived like mistakes have serious costs?
Discussion Jumpstarter

Direct Answer
The transcript indicts casual risk-taking with influences (tech/media, questionable activities, unsupervised spaces, independent decisions) as if consequences are unlikely; living like the “margin of error is slim” means reducing unnecessary exposure, monitoring closely, and making decisions together for the sake of the vulnerable.

Support from Transcript:
  • “Somehow we have to find answers… Otherwise, we’re playing Anabaptist roulette.”
  • He applies it to activities that seem harmless: rodeos, Bible schools, I-58, music camp—good reasons don’t remove risk for unstable youth.
  • He warns: “In this day and age, our margin of error is so slim, we need to stop taking chances. 30 years ago, the chance was much greater.”
  • He gives a concrete risk: a “vulnerable youth would have gone with us and would not have been fine.”
  • He challenges passive parenting in church settings: fathers talking for hours without checking on children; later discovering “inappropriate behavior.”
Discussion Follow-ups What “chances” have become normal in your church (devices, unsupervised youth time, casual media)? If you treated risk as slim, what would you discontinue, and what would you replace it with?