Discussion Jumpstarter

Study leader reference - not a definitive answer

Question 8

Lactantius says groups named after men (Phrygians, Novatians, etc.) “have ceased to be Christians,” and Mike jokes about adding “Baptists or Mennonites or Amish”; in a world where labels feel unavoidable, what would it take for your church identity to be genuinely “of Christ” rather than primarily a protective tribe with “pet doctrines” to prove you’re the right ones?

Another way to ask: With so many Christian labels, what would it take for your main identity to be “of Christ” instead of loyalty to a group that protects its favorite doctrines?

Discussion Jumpstarter

Direct Answer
According to the transcript, being genuinely “of Christ” would mean prioritizing obedience to Jesus and the apostolic faith over brand identity, and treating labels as secondary and (at best) practical descriptions rather than spiritual proof.

Support from Transcript:

Mike quotes Lactantius: groups named after men “have ceased to be Christians… assumed human and external names,” while the universal church retained “true worship.”
He connects this to Paul’s rebuke (1 Corinthians): not “I am of Apollos… Cephas… Paul,” but “we’re of Christ.”
Mike jokes about adding “Baptists or Mennonites or Amish,” but then admits: “nowadays… there’s not one unified faith,” so labels may function to communicate what people mean.
He critiques the modern world of “thousands of denominations” all claiming Scripture/Spirit but teaching differently.
He warns against becoming a “lone ranger Christian,” suggesting identity must still include real church unity and accountability.
He repeatedly emphasizes a return to “true historic faith… once for all delivered,” rather than “pet” distinctives.

Discussion Follow-ups If your label were removed tomorrow, what would remain non-negotiable—Jesus’ commands, apostolic doctrine, church discipline, shared life? How can a group keep distinctives without turning them into proof of superiority?

Jumpstarter 8 of 10